TMS Treatment for Depression — NeuroStar™ Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Non-Invasive Deep Brain Stimulation ... Remission from Depression is Possible!
Board-Certified Psychiatry and Neurology.
NeuroStar™ Golden Circle* Recognized
for Highest Experience in TMS Treatment.
Florida's Premier TMS Treatment Provider
Now Accepting Appointments for TMS Evaluation and TMS Therapy
Call Now to Schedule: 386-774-6001
Clinical Data on TMS Therapy - FAQ
-
NeuroStar TMS Therapy was studied in 301 depressed patients who had failed to receive benefit from prior antidepressant medications.
-
A 6-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the safe and effective use of NeuroStar TMS as a monotherapy.
-
An analysis for predictors of response demonstrated that the patients with the best response to NeuroStar TMS Therapy were adults who have failed to achieve satisfactory improvement from one prior antidepressant medication at or above the minimal effective dose and duration in the current episode.
o Patients had received a median of 4 total prior antidepressant treatment attempts in the current episode, one of which achieved treatment adequacy at or above the minimal effective dose and duration.
In indicated patients, the following efficacy results were observed in the randomized, controlled study:
-
The primary efficacy measure was statistically significantly superior to placebo (p=0.0006) among NeuroStar-treated patients.
-
NeuroStar TMS Therapy-treated patients had statistically significant response and remission rates, which were approximately twice the rate of placebo-treated patients.
Patients who did not respond in the randomized, controlled study entered into a 6-week, open-label treatment study. In the open-label study, which is most like real-world clinical practice, the following was observed:
-
Patients treated for the first time with NeuroStar TMS Therapy achieved a 54% response rate and a 33% remission rate on the HAMD 24-item scale at the end of 6 weeks
-
Similar results were observed using the MADRS rating scale.
Throughout the clinical studies, more than 10,000 active TMS treatments demonstrated the safety of NeuroStar TMS Therapy. The following were the safety results observed5:
-
No systemic side effects, such as weight gain, sexual dysfunction, sedation, nausea, or dry mouth
-
The most commonly reported side effect related to treatment was scalp pain or discomfort during the TMS treatment session.
-
There was a less than 5% discontinuation rate due to adverse events.
-
No seizures were reported.
-
Yes, particularly in patients who had failed multiple treatment attempts, one of which achieved an adequate dose and duration
-
In the randomized, controlled trial, almost 3x the number of NeuroStar-treated patients had a significant improvement in symptoms as compared to placebo.
o The magnitude of difference between active and placebo treatments compares favorably to results for most antidepressant medications approved for the treatment of depression, despite the fact that almost all antidepressant medications have been studied and approved for 1st-line treatment.
o In the NeuroStar open-label trial, which is most like the real world, ~1 in 2 patients had a significant improvement and 1 in 3 had complete symptom resolution.
-
In addition to efficacy, NeuroStar’s safety/tolerability profile is also clinically meaningful
o It is non-systemic, which means it does not cause side effects such as weight gain, sexual dysfunction, nausea, dry mouth, or sedation.
o The most commonly reported side effect related to treatment was scalp pain or discomfort during the treatment session.
- Adults
- Unipolar, non-psychotic depression diagnosis
-
Had failed at least one, but no more than four, previous medications at an adequate dose and duration in the current episode.
-
There were no incidents of reported suicide or suicide attempts in patients treated with NeuroStar TMS Therapy during the clinical trials.
-
Patients who were at high risk of suicide were not included in the trial.
-
In addition, a careful analysis of the safety data showed that there was no evidence that NeuroStar TMS Therapy was associated with worsening of suicidal ideation during acute treatment.
-
NeuroStar TMS Therapy has only systematically been evaluated in patients with unipolar, non-psychotic major depression
-
While there is promising data in a variety of other disorders, these data are preliminary and require systematic evaluation in controlled clinical trials
-
For information on other potential uses for TMS, contact Neuronetics Customer Service and our Medical Affairs staff can provide you with this information.
NeuroStar TMS Therapy vs. ECT, Cyberonics VNS, and others
-
VNS Therapy requires a surgical procedure, during which the patient is anesthetized and has a device implanted in the neck and chest; NeuroStar is completely non-invasive.
-
Unlike VNS, NeuroStar TMS Therapy is non-invasive and does not require surgery, anesthesia or sedation. With NeuroStar TMS, patients can return to their normal activities immediately after the 37-minute therapy session.
-
VNS Therapy is approved as an adjunctive treatment to treat depressed patients who have failed at least four previous antidepressant medications. NeuroStar TMS can be used as a monotherapy and is intended to be used earlier in the treatment algorithm
-
VNS is not an acute treatment; NeuroStar TMS Therapy is an acute treatment.
- ECT is an effective acute treatment for major depression, but it is highly invasive (causing seizure induction and requiring anesthesia) and has significant adverse effects. In contrast, TMS is also effective in patients with Major Depressive Disorder but it is non-invasive and has an excellent safety profile.
- ECT and TMS both use applied energy to the brain to cause neural stimulation for relieving the symptoms of depression. ECT uses electrical energy applied to the whole brain, while TMS uses magnetic energy applied only to the left prefrontal cortex.
- TMS will likely be used much earlier in the treatment algorithm than ECT for depression patients because of its favorable risk/benefit ratio
-
ECT will continue to have an important role for certain depression patients despite safety concerns; however, it is usually reserved as a treatment of “last resort”.
-
NeuroStar TMS Therapy has not been compared to ECT in randomized, controlled head-to-head clinical studies
-
ECT is known to be an effective antidepressant but its significant side effects detract from its clinical utility for many patients
-
Unlike ECT, TMS does not require anesthesia, sedation and the production of a convulsion, does not result in adverse effects on memory or concentration, and has an excellent safety and tolerability profile
-
The proven effectiveness of TMS and its excellent safety and tolerability indicate that TMS will likely be used much earlier in the treatment algorithm, because of this favorable risk/benefit ratio
Schedule Your NeuroStar TMS Consultation...
Call Weekdays for Appointments
Ph. 386-774-6001
West Volusia Psychiatric Associates
250 Treemonte Drive
Orange City, FL 32763
ph: 386-774-6001
Copyright © 2016-2019 West Volusia Psychiatric Associates, and Edmundo I. Rivera, M.D., all rights reserved. Portions copyright © Neuronetics and NeuroStar™ displayed with
expressed permission for use. Penalty for unauthorized re-use or re-publication of any content in any form without expressed, written consent of the respective rights-holder or owner.